classcoward: (Default)
[personal profile] classcoward
You wanted to discuss something?

Date: 2009-07-08 01:32 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
I wonder if someone knows something about the clue that we don't. But at this stage it could just be random, the shepherds want us all to vote in suspicion no matter what.

Date: 2009-07-08 01:42 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
One vote on Canaan and Heat, presumably because it looks like they're in the clue either way, and another vote on Sapphire and Ben.

Should we wait to place ours? I want to see how other people vote first, or if we work out who the clue refers to. We still have 20 minutes until ousting after all.

Date: 2009-07-08 01:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
I agree with the sentiment that if Heat's team are the only ones we can be sure are in the clue, we should oust them. It's a pity to not have three teams to debate properly but it's not like there will be much to go on at this stage anyway.

Date: 2009-07-08 01:55 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
There is also an argument that it could be Partnerstvo.

Mukuro seemed pleasant enough but it is clear that people don't trust him as the clue suggested. It seems odd for his partner to have come forward with being a tactician and put his team under suspicion when another team was being suspected as the team in the clue. Although I suppose in the long run it is better to be helpful, wolf or sheep.

Date: 2009-07-08 01:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
Maybe we should just vote for Partneritet since it seems like they will go to the ousting anyway, especially if those who dislike them can argue that they are in the clue.

Date: 2009-07-08 02:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
More people with "they're in the clue, oust them" logic?

Date: 2009-07-08 01:57 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
Another vote for Partneritet and one for... Partnerskap? Why them?

Date: 2009-07-08 02:01 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
I wish Yuta's partner would speak. He came forward with a reason he might be in the clue, but we can't know unless his partner fits the other half.

Date: 2009-07-08 02:04 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
Impossible to tell. Well, he can't stay silent forever.

Date: 2009-07-08 02:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
So we're decided on Mukuro's team?

Date: 2009-07-08 02:24 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
You can do the honours, then.

I can't decide if Chris is a terrible sheep or a terrible wolf...

Date: 2009-07-08 02:58 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
They seem average to me. Trying to be helpful where they can but not standing out too much.

Date: 2009-07-08 03:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] maman-a-tort.livejournal.com
Did they? Must have missed that. It's quite possible that they are simply easily swayed, after all it was very chaotic at the time and defences for Canaan's team only really began in the ousting itself.

Profile

classcoward: (Default)
Charles "Chuck" Bass

July 2009

S M T W T F S
   1234
56 7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 26th, 2026 11:48 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios